<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Misfiring Neurons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pavel.tcholakov.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pavel.tcholakov.net</link>
	<description>Just another geek with a blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:59:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows Vista Chronicles by Björn Widell</title>
		<link>http://pavel.tcholakov.net/2008/07/windows-vista-chronicles/comment-page-1/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Björn Widell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kay.za.net/?p=71#comment-752</guid>
		<description>Same problem of indexing by Vista with DNG Codec, loaded in Dec 2009. It is a shame that Adobe releases such scrap.

Björn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same problem of indexing by Vista with DNG Codec, loaded in Dec 2009. It is a shame that Adobe releases such scrap.</p>
<p>Björn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vista and file deletion by Sam</title>
		<link>http://pavel.tcholakov.net/2009/04/vista-and-file-deletion/comment-page-1/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 01:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavel.tcholakov.net/?p=134#comment-748</guid>
		<description>Where is the &quot;rmdir /s&quot;.  This is a chronic problem with my laptop for about 3 months.  Have had Vista since Jan 09 on a new laptop.  All of a sudden on day this sam deletion window appeared and locks up my computer so I have to shut down and restart to get rid of the window.  Also appearing at the same time was an explorer window that appeared wanting to know if I wanted to go to the last web site visited.  This has been nerve racking and a problem since it started</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is the &#8220;rmdir /s&#8221;.  This is a chronic problem with my laptop for about 3 months.  Have had Vista since Jan 09 on a new laptop.  All of a sudden on day this sam deletion window appeared and locks up my computer so I have to shut down and restart to get rid of the window.  Also appearing at the same time was an explorer window that appeared wanting to know if I wanted to go to the last web site visited.  This has been nerve racking and a problem since it started</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lightroom 3 Beta begins with big improvements in image quality by Pavel</title>
		<link>http://pavel.tcholakov.net/2009/10/lightroom-3-beta-begins-with-big-improvements-in-image-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavel.tcholakov.net/?p=170#comment-699</guid>
		<description>Hi Sebastien, thanks for stopping by! I have to say that I hadn&#039;t seen any jaggies up until now but looking at some files with sharp diagonal lines I can definitely see a bit of difference - Lightroom 2.5 looks a touch softer. At 200% magnification it just looks like more aggressive sharpening to me, but nothing like your examples. At 100% the jaggies are very faint and almost non-existent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sebastien, thanks for stopping by! I have to say that I hadn&#8217;t seen any jaggies up until now but looking at some files with sharp diagonal lines I can definitely see a bit of difference &#8211; Lightroom 2.5 looks a touch softer. At 200% magnification it just looks like more aggressive sharpening to me, but nothing like your examples. At 100% the jaggies are very faint and almost non-existent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lightroom 3 Beta begins with big improvements in image quality by Sebastien</title>
		<link>http://pavel.tcholakov.net/2009/10/lightroom-3-beta-begins-with-big-improvements-in-image-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavel.tcholakov.net/?p=170#comment-698</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post. I&#039;ve a different experience though, and I was wondering if you noticed that as well. What I&#039;m actually seeing in my LR3 is a *lot* of aliasing. 
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/512631?tstart=0
http://forums.adobe.com/servlet/JiveServlet/download/2341576-24697/aliasing-in-lr3.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post. I&#8217;ve a different experience though, and I was wondering if you noticed that as well. What I&#8217;m actually seeing in my LR3 is a *lot* of aliasing.<br />
<a href="http://forums.adobe.com/thread/512631?tstart=0" rel="nofollow">http://forums.adobe.com/thread/512631?tstart=0</a><br />
<a href="http://forums.adobe.com/servlet/JiveServlet/download/2341576-24697/aliasing-in-lr3.png" rel="nofollow">http://forums.adobe.com/servlet/JiveServlet/download/2341576-24697/aliasing-in-lr3.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lightroom 3 Beta begins with big improvements in image quality by a little bit of everything&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://pavel.tcholakov.net/2009/10/lightroom-3-beta-begins-with-big-improvements-in-image-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>a little bit of everything&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavel.tcholakov.net/?p=170#comment-697</guid>
		<description>[...] Tcholakov tests the new Adobe Lightroom 3 beta: http://pavel.tcholakov.net/2009/10/lightroom-3-beta-begins-with-big-improvements-in-image-quality/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tcholakov tests the new Adobe Lightroom 3 beta: <a href="http://pavel.tcholakov.net/2009/10/lightroom-3-beta-begins-with-big-improvements-in-image-quality/" rel="nofollow">http://pavel.tcholakov.net/2009/10/lightroom-3-beta-begins-with-big-improvements-in-image-quality/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lightroom 3 Beta begins with big improvements in image quality by 链接笔记 &#124; Thinking on Photography</title>
		<link>http://pavel.tcholakov.net/2009/10/lightroom-3-beta-begins-with-big-improvements-in-image-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>链接笔记 &#124; Thinking on Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavel.tcholakov.net/?p=170#comment-696</guid>
		<description>[...] 前面文章我们已经提到了LR3对于降噪和画质算法的巨大改进，马上就有博客贴出了一系列对比图，很好很强大。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 前面文章我们已经提到了LR3对于降噪和画质算法的巨大改进，马上就有博客贴出了一系列对比图，很好很强大。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Developers, developers, developers by Pavel</title>
		<link>http://pavel.tcholakov.net/2009/08/windows-command-line-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavel.tcholakov.net/?p=155#comment-628</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the MinTTY tip, Andy! I didn&#039;t know about it before and the fact that it&#039;s also included in the Cygwin distribution means there&#039;s one less thing to worry about installing separately. I&#039;ve been playing with it this morning and it looks like I won&#039;t be needing puttycyg anymore ;-) See - some good things do come out of rants!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the MinTTY tip, Andy! I didn&#8217;t know about it before and the fact that it&#8217;s also included in the Cygwin distribution means there&#8217;s one less thing to worry about installing separately. I&#8217;ve been playing with it this morning and it looks like I won&#8217;t be needing puttycyg anymore <img src='http://pavel.tcholakov.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  See &#8211; some good things do come out of rants!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Developers, developers, developers by Andy</title>
		<link>http://pavel.tcholakov.net/2009/08/windows-command-line-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 05:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavel.tcholakov.net/?p=155#comment-627</guid>
		<description>Agreed, the Windows console is a joke. Have a look at Console2, which puts a more usable interface on it. As for Cygwin, try MinTTY, which is a dedicated Cygwin terminal based on parts of PuTTY. Leaner and more xterm-compatible than PuTTYcyg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, the Windows console is a joke. Have a look at Console2, which puts a more usable interface on it. As for Cygwin, try MinTTY, which is a dedicated Cygwin terminal based on parts of PuTTY. Leaner and more xterm-compatible than PuTTYcyg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome OS by kay</title>
		<link>http://pavel.tcholakov.net/2009/07/google-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavel.tcholakov.net/?p=145#comment-589</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a distinct possibility - especially with the stated availability of an ARM port (the iPhone and many other smartphones run one version or another of the ARM CPU). But I also think that Android fills that niche better - it has many phone-specific apps already such as SMS, email client, stills/video camera, and supports Java/Dalvik apps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a distinct possibility &#8211; especially with the stated availability of an ARM port (the iPhone and many other smartphones run one version or another of the ARM CPU). But I also think that Android fills that niche better &#8211; it has many phone-specific apps already such as SMS, email client, stills/video camera, and supports Java/Dalvik apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome OS by angie</title>
		<link>http://pavel.tcholakov.net/2009/07/google-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pavel.tcholakov.net/?p=145#comment-588</guid>
		<description>what about for cellphone use to penetrate the african market and establish a foothold in an untapped area?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about for cellphone use to penetrate the african market and establish a foothold in an untapped area?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
